Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2018 16:16:48 GMT -5
That would accord with my theory of vision quest, where you live or adopt a setting or situation more like people who are generally considered more gifted.
Other than some strange “footprints” there was nothing supernatural. Perhaps the area was more conducive to extra spiritual phenomenon and maybe that helps accelerate certain types of brain activity. Or open it up if it’s closed.
|
|
|
Post by julia on Mar 26, 2018 17:58:16 GMT -5
I'm not saying that some races are better overall, although some are certainly more successful. What I'm saying is that I believe that American Indians are more perceptive because until white Europeans came to America, the Indians were still living like whites lived back during the Iron Age. Therefore, they aren't as far removed from the spiritual as white people and haven't completely lost their sixth sense, Third Eye, or whatever you want to call it. That's just my opinion. You make an excellent point, Jane.
|
|
|
Post by Kate on Mar 26, 2018 21:30:35 GMT -5
It wasn't my intention to cause discord. I was just stating my opinion on why I believe that women are naturally more perceptive than men and why people are losing what may have been a sixth sense at one time. I wasn't addressing vision quests or what people might perceive when they actively seek visions. I also think that as a whole, American Indians are more perceptive than the average person. Something else that I think is important is how in tune a person is with nature. Someone who spends a lot of time outdoors walking in the woods, working in the garden, or just lying in the sun are more in tune with nature than people who spend all their time indoors watching TV or online. Also those who follow the phases of the moon and are affected by the full moon would be more successful. I also think that people who are constantly talking or texting on their cellphones would have a hard time connecting with the spiritual plane.
|
|
|
Post by Isbeau on May 23, 2018 0:09:54 GMT -5
Intuition helps you read the temporal plane too. Hillary must have been on her cell phone a lot.
|
|
|
Post by Kate on May 23, 2018 13:09:13 GMT -5
Intuition helps you read the temporal plane too. Hillary must have been on her cell phone a lot. How do you "read" the temporal plane? Are you talking about phrenology?
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 23, 2018 15:31:43 GMT -5
How do you "read" the temporal plane? Are you talking about phrenology? I've heard of phrenology, but I don't really know anything about it. I did read somewhere once that people with wide faces are more likely to be cheaters than those with thin faces, or something on the order of that.
|
|
|
Post by Isbeau on Jun 5, 2018 10:40:06 GMT -5
Prior to Bill Clinton, almost any type of indiscretion would have ruled you out as a President.
I don't know how Hillary could have thought anything Donald Trump did could have cost him the election. But even I though the tapes might have blown it for him.
But her bringing that up over and over worked against her. I don't see why I'd pick her over him because he had locker room talk about women and she doesn't. She's a woman for crying out loud.
|
|
|
Post by pat on Jun 5, 2018 13:56:09 GMT -5
Prior to Bill Clinton, almost any type of indiscretion would have ruled you out as a President. I don't know how Hillary could have thought anything Donald Trump did could have cost him the election. But even I though the tapes might have blown it for him. But her bringing that up over and over worked against her. I don't see why I'd pick her over him because he had locker room talk about women and she doesn't. She's a woman for crying out loud. One president, I forget which, had an illegitimate child that he supported. The difference is that back then, people didn't know everything about everyone like they do today.
I voted for Trump and the tapes didn't bother me because that's the way men talk when there aren't any women around and 99% of what they say is pure BS. However, I did lose all respect for Billy Bush for releasing the tapes.
|
|
|
Post by madeline on Jun 5, 2018 19:58:43 GMT -5
Prior to Bill Clinton, almost any type of indiscretion would have ruled you out as a President. I don't know how Hillary could have thought anything Donald Trump did could have cost him the election. But even I though the tapes might have blown it for him. But her bringing that up over and over worked against her. I don't see why I'd pick her over him because he had locker room talk about women and she doesn't. She's a woman for crying out loud. One of Hillary's biggest problems -- other than being a crook and liar and failing at everything she'd ever done -- was that she thought she was smarter than everybody else. Actually, she's exceptionally dim when it comes to knowing what people want. I couldn't have cared less about Trump's locker room talk and I don't know anyone who voted for him who did care.
|
|
|
Post by jason on Jun 9, 2018 16:45:28 GMT -5
One president, I forget which, had an illegitimate child that he supported. The difference is that back then, people didn't know everything about everyone like they do today.
I voted for Trump and the tapes didn't bother me because that's the way men talk when there aren't any women around and 99% of what they say is pure BS. However, I did lose all respect for Billy Bush for releasing the tapes. It was Grover Cleveland. When he was running for president, the Democrats came up with the following joke: "Ma, Ma, where's my pa? "Gone to the White House, Ha, Ha, Ha!"
|
|
|
Post by Isbeau on Aug 18, 2018 17:55:37 GMT -5
I'm not saying that some races are better overall, although some are certainly more successful. What I'm saying is that I believe that American Indians are more perceptive because until white Europeans came to America, the Indians were still living like whites lived back during the Iron Age. Therefore, they aren't as far removed from the spiritual as white people and haven't completely lost their sixth sense, Third Eye, or whatever you want to call it. That's just my opinion. Native Americans were still populating the "New World" without the economic need to compete with other tribes as much as they were merely hunting animals so they had not major arms race. Bows and arrows and spears was all that was necessary. "Primitive" in more open territory is better as they don't need to be as militarized or tightly controlled by a select Druidic class like European civilizations and Western countries today. They did have shaman but all males were encouraged to go and receive a vision. Even when a man has it, can it be called a Feminine intuition?
|
|
|
Post by Isbeau on Aug 18, 2018 18:58:27 GMT -5
I think a unicorn is a symbol of the Third Eye and it's considered to be feminine energy. Men were encouraged to get it and women were encouraged not to use it.
That said, I've now changed my opinion because of my unscientific poll study in the Everything Else section and believe that women go third eye blind like men, for similar reasons but not exactly the same way but with the same result. I agree with Kate that cell phones are a problem.
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Aug 18, 2018 20:23:22 GMT -5
I think a unicorn is a symbol of the Third Eye and it's considered to be feminine energy. Men were encouraged to get it and women were encouraged not to use it. That said, I've now changed my opinion because of my unscientific poll study in the Everything Else section and believe that women go third eye blind like men, for similar reasons but not exactly the same way but with the same result. I agree with Kate that cell phones are a problem. Could you please explain what you're talking about because I don't understand what you mean by the Third Eye? At first I thought that it was intuition, but now you seem to be saying that it's something else.
|
|
|
Post by Isbeau on Aug 18, 2018 20:36:44 GMT -5
Third eye
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The third eye (also called the mind's eye, or inner eye) is a mystical and esoteric concept of a speculative invisible eye which provides perception beyond ordinary sight.
Standard definition. I don't think I've deviated.
Intuition is sometimes included as part of it. You can include it or not. I think that's part of the receptive "eye". Third eye includes everything including the penetrative eye.
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Aug 19, 2018 14:19:39 GMT -5
Third eye From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The third eye (also called the mind's eye, or inner eye) is a mystical and esoteric concept of a speculative invisible eye which provides perception beyond ordinary sight. Standard definition. I don't think I've deviated. Intuition is sometimes included as part of it. You can include it or not. I think that's part of the receptive "eye". Third eye includes everything including the penetrative eye. Thank you for replying, but I don't trust Wikipedia. Could you post a link to a reliable site that explains the Third Eye?
|
|