|
Post by ikmike05 on Sept 6, 2022 16:03:43 GMT -5
Back when I was a hippie we were all pretty peace and love until Charles Manson and all of a sudden we were all evil you cannot judge an entire group by a few people or even a larger quantity of them there are really good gypsies out there that are born good and stay good and also ones that are born bad and turn good hypocrisy of you so called good people false as you steal from the native americans,exetera
|
|
|
Post by JoannaL on Sept 6, 2022 16:29:40 GMT -5
Back when I was a hippie we were all pretty peace and love until Charles Manson and all of a sudden we were all evil you cannot judge an entire group by a few people or even a larger quantity of them there are really good gypsies out there that are born good and stay good and also ones that are born bad and turn good hypocrisy of you so called good people false as you steal from the native americans,exetera Your comment is off-topic. This thread is for discussion of the Darlie Routier case and said case has nothing to do with hippies, Charles Manson, gypsies or allegedly stealing from American Indians. Additionally, we have a rule against political discussions, so in the future, please keep your political opinions to yourself.
|
|
|
Post by snowfairy on Jun 2, 2023 6:22:08 GMT -5
I don't know why this Bevel character is still in business as a blood spatter expert -- if he is. I saw on Dateline, in the case of Dr. John Hamilton, the Oklahoma doctor who was convicted of killing his wife, where Bevel was hired by the defense and then got on the witness stand and said the blood spatter on Hamilton's sleeve was consistent with beating his wife over the head with a blunt object, and got him convicted. Did he forget he was supposed to be testifying for the defense, not the prosecution? Can an "expert" who made such a mistake in one case be trusted in another? His "expertise" has also been questioned in other cases.
|
|