Post by natalie on May 8, 2017 14:53:20 GMT -5
By Sandhya Somashekhar, The Washington Post, May 6, 2017
After months of acrimony, the city decided to make part of the park a "public forum," open to virtually any group that wants to honor the town's veterans. The Satanic Temple took them up on it.
It is not the first such effort from the Satanic Temple, a provocative organization that often pushes the boundaries on free speech and religious liberties to prove a point about religion in public spaces; last year, it started its "After School Satan" clubs as a way of challenging Christian evangelical groups that sponsor after-school religious programming. But this is the first time that the group has succeeded in having a monument placed on public land, said Lucien Greaves (above), spokesman for the organization, which is based in Salem, Mass. Belle Plaine officials "didn't offer any resistance, to their credit," added Greaves, who also goes by the name Doug Mesner. "We genuinely want something that will honor the veterans. It's not about being shocking or upsetting the locals, though it's an inevitable byproduct.
City officials considered that the new policy could invite provocateurs, but approved it anyway. "It was discussed during our city council meeting when we authored the policy that groups that were unpopular or otherwise would put monuments in the park," said Michael Votca, the city administrator.
The flare-up in this town about 45 miles southwest of Minneapolis comes as the country is mired in a heated battle over religious freedom and the rights of people of faith, particularly conservative Christians, to opt out of activities that support same-sex marriage, abortion or birth control. On Thursday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at expanding religious protections that, among other things, soften enforcement of the Johnson Amendment, which bars tax-exempt houses of worship from engaging in political speech.
But as the Satanic Temple has tried to demonstrate, expanding religious liberties can have unintended consequences. Because the Constitution bars the establishment of a national religion, it requires that the same protections be extended to people of all faiths, including ones with disturbing connotations such as satanism and those who profess no faith. Greaves said his organization is now considering applying for the same tax-exempt status that churches and synagogues enjoy. It previously avoided doing so to freely engage in politics. But with Trump's executive order, he admitted, "there's absolutely no advantage to not be tax-exempt. A lot more organizations should apply and put it to the test." He claimed that his organization does not worship the devil. Rather, he said, it is a "nontheistic religious organization" devoted to art, free speech and individuality, whose values "are no less deeply held" than those professing a belief in God. In its application to the city, the organization described the monument as a "black steel cube with embossed inverted pentagrams with inlaid gold on four sides. An inverted helmet rests on the top of the cube. A plaque on one side of the cube reads: 'In honor of Belle Plaine veterans who fought to defend the United States and its Constitution.'"
Belle Plaine has been grappling with its park policy since last summer, when the two-foot statue of the kneeling soldier appeared. Katie Novotny, a Belle Plaine resident and veterans advocate, said it was created by a local vet who died shortly after it was put up. It is affectionately dubbed "Joe." Novotny contends that it is not a religious display. Joe, she said, is simply kneeling at a headstone fashioned into the shape of a cross, which is a common way for gravestones to be depicted. "I don't think 90 percent of people see it as a religious symbol when it's in that context," she said.
Nevertheless, fearing a lawsuit, the city ordered the cross removed in January. Someone from the local Veterans of Foreign Wars group was tasked with sawing it off the statue, she said. The person given that job "said it was the hardest thing he ever had to do," she said. The decision immediately prompted protests. People fashioned their own crosses and defiantly installed them next to the statue. Around the town, Novotny added, citizens who supported the original display put replicas in their windows – including the cross.
The city eventually hit upon a compromise. It established a "limited public forum" within the park in which groups could erect, with city permission, a monument honoring the town's veterans. The permits last for a year, and no more than 10 monuments may be displayed at a time. The cross was welded back onto the statue. Joe and his cross returned to the park last month.
Novotny said she does not object to the Satanic Temple's plans. "If they want to come here from Massachusetts and put something up to honor our veterans in Belle Plaine, go for it," she said. "They deserve to be honored."
Some other places have opted to ban all religious displays when faced with this type conflict. In 2015, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that a monument of the Ten Commandments had to be removed from its grounds for violating a state prohibition against use of public property to promote one religion.
Another group planning to apply for a spot at the Belle Plaine park is the Freedom From Religion Foundation, which objected to the cross display. It is planning to commission a stone tribute to "atheists in foxholes" – a take on an old saying suggesting that everyone finds God when faced with death. Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, predicted that city officials will come to regret opening the park to all displays. "They're going to run out of space," she observed. "It will just be littered ... One day, they will look at everything and decide, was it really worth it?"